Cinemas Palme D’Or will always have a special place in my heart

SAMSUNG CSCBryan Cranston moderates a questions and answer session with Jonah Hill following a viewing of “The Wolf of Wall Street.”

 

By Leighton Ginn

I will always have a soft spot for independent movie theaters, so when Cinemas Palme D’Or announced it will close, it was emotional for me.

I grew up near the University of Arizona, and on campus it had the New Loft Cinemas. Much like Cinemas Palme D’Or, the Loft showed a wide array of movies. Some popular and in the major theaters, others of the art-house fare.

So when I was about 10 or so, maybe even younger, I would walk to the Loft with my brother Nathan, and we would catch different movies. I remember seeing a bunch of Woody Allen movies, even though I didn’t understand what they were talking about.

I think at that age, “Annie Hall” was my favorite because of the animated scene with Woody and the Wicked Stepmother.

I also remember watching “Taxi Driver,” and it was nothing like the television show “Taxi.” I think I slept through most of the movie, but woke up for the violent climax, which I was much too young for.

In fourth grade, I caught the “Rocky Horror Picture Show.” My friend loved it much more than me, so much that he would sing the songs in class. Even at that young age, I thought it was weird when my friend dressed as Frank-N-Furter and sang “Sweet Transvestite” in front of the class. It was a progressive school.

Going to these movies were fond memories for me and my brother. We have very different personalities, so this was one of the few things we had in common.

When Cinemas Palme D’Or opened, the big draw was they had question and answer sessions with the stars or movie makers.

It was a chance to meet some big celebrities, most of all, Bryan Cranston. When he was the moderator for some Q&A’s, I showed up with a bag of blue candy that’s supposed to look like Blue Sky, the nickname of the drugs his character Walter White made in the television series “Breaking Bad.”

He was nice enough to humor me.

It was an opportunity to meet a lot of great stars, like Aaron Paul and Jonah Hill. It was also cool to say my neighborhood theater is owned by Walter White.

But Cranston wasn’t the sole owner. I also got to know Steve Mason, of ESPN radio in Los Angeles. Many times, Mason would moderate the Q&As until he got busier in Los Angeles.

About three years ago, my brother Nathan moved with me in Palm Springs to get a restart on his life after taking care of our parents.

So we got to go to Cinemas Palme D’Or. Because Nathan wanted to be a media professional, he decided to film some of these Q&A’s and post them on YouTube.

Nathan also got to meet Cranston, as well as other great stars like Bob Odenkirk (“Better Call Saul”), Oscar Isaac (“The Force Awakens”), Will Forte (“Last Man Standing”) and Oscar winner Brie Larson (“Room”).

 

I couldn’t go to all the Q&As, but Nathan was there for just about all of them. He got to know Mason, and after a while, it seemed like everyone at the theater, as well as the regulars.

Bill Feingold, the popular radio host on KNews94.3 in the Palm Springs area, was another great moderator who got to know Nathan pretty well. Kay Shackleton, a local entertainment writer who also authors the P.S. Movie Gal blog among other endeavors, became an incredibly good friend of Nathan as well.

While getting her credentials to the Oscars, she brought Nathan along with her to experience a bit of the hoopla.

I was really grateful for them, because Nathan was moving away from everything he knew when he came here, and Cinemas Palme D’Or gave him a community to be apart of.

A year ago at this time, Nathan had a heart episode that led to him falling into a coma. It will be a year in June when he passed away.

I had spent a month by his side before he passed away. It was tough always having to deal with doctors and making decisions. Two days after Nathan passed away, I had gone to Cinemas Palme D’Or. As much as I was grieving, I also needed some kind of escape.

When I was there, Bill Feingold had heard about Nathan and made an announcement prior to the film.

 

That moment meant a great deal to me. Bill told me afterwards he tried not to cry. I was the same.

I was in Seattle when I heard the news Cinemas Palme D’Or would be closing. It was unexpected, and surprising. But they had been trying to fight to get more mainstream films at the theater and the lawsuit was getting more and more expensive.

I wish there were more theaters like Cinemas Palme D’Or, not less. If it weren’t for their Q&A’s, I likely wouldn’t have gone out of my way to watch some of those films.

But most of all, it created a community that meant a lot to me, as well as several other people.

So thank you to Cranston, Mason, the rest of the owners, staff and fans of Cinemas Palme D’Or. You will be missed, but the memories are incredibly fond.

 

 

 

 

 

Serena Williams’ loss might be the most disappointing in tennis history

Serena Williams talks to the media during the BNP Paribas Open in March, 2015.

Serena Williams talks to the media during the BNP Paribas Open in March, 2015.

It is rare air to get a whiff at completing the Grand Slam, but Serena Williams coming within three sets of completing the historic milestone might be the most heartbreaking of losses.

Williams saw her Grand Slam dreams come to an end when she was upset by the unseeded Roberta Vinci 2-6, 6-4, 6-4, which also saw Williams have an early break in the third set.

Twice, Williams has won four consecutive majors, including this year, which she’s dubbed the Serena Slam. But the true Grand Slam is winning all four in the same year, starting with the Australian Open and ending with the US Open. The last person to do it was Steffi Graf in 1988, a year where she also won the Olympic gold medal.

Had Williams won, she would have joined the exclusive sorority of Graf, Margaret Court (1970) and Maureen Connelly (1953) as the only females to do it in women’s tennis. On the men’s side, only Rod Laver (1962, ’69) and Don Budge (1938) did it.

Completing the true Grand Slam would have been an indisputable fact when people argue who the greatest tennis players ever were. This is why in some circles, Laver is still considered the greatest tennis player, because he’s the only player in history to complete the Grand Slam twice and the only male player to do it on the Open era.

Because Williams didn’t complete the Grand Slam, Graf and Court are the only females to complete the Grand Slam in the Open era, and Graf is the only one to do it on three different surfaces.

Who comes that close to a Grand Slam and loses it by three sets? That will be a tough one to swallow for Williams, who was so close from a historic achievement.

Williams has tried to talk down the significance of the Grand Slam, but judging by her brief post-match press conference, it disappointed her more than she wanted to let on.

Everything was set up for Williams as she would not have had to face a top-10 player in the US Open to the title. It was tailor made for Williams to complete the Slam.

Now everyone wants to make out that this is a huge upset in the ranks of Buster Douglas knocking out Mike Tyson, Villanova beating Georgetown in the NCAA final or the US Olympic hockey team beating the Russians. And maybe it is, as Vinci was only ranked 43rd coming into the US Open and never made it this far in a major.

But here’s a few things to consider as well: Williams has a habit of losing to unlikely players in big tournaments.

Since the start of 2012, Serena Williams has lost eight times in major tournaments, and the highest-ranked player she lost to was No. 14 Ana Ivanovic in the fourth round of last year’s Australian Open.

Her other losses have come to No. 56 Ekaterine Makarova in the fourth round of the 2012 Australian Open, No. 111 Virginie Razzano in the first round of the 2012 French Open, No. 25 Sloan Stephens in the quarterfinals of the 2013 Australian Open, No. 24 Sabine Lisicki in the fourth round of the 2013 Wimbledon, No. 35 Garbine Muguruza in the second round of the 2014 French Open, No. 24 Alize Cornet in the third round of Wimbledon. Vinci is ranked 43rd heading into this year’s US Open.

There is another perception of Williams that appears to be misleading. While Williams has completed her second “Serena Slam,” winning four consecutive majors, she has been anything but dominant.

In the Serena Slam from 2002-03, Williams lost four sets. This year, Williams lost five sets in the French Open alone, and a total of nine during the Serena Slam. At the US Open, Williams lost four sets (one of Bethanie Mattek-Sands, one to Venus Williams and two to Vinci).

It has been an exceptional year for Williams, but not as dominant as she can be.

The first Serena Slam was so much more impressive if you look at the depth of the women’s game, particularly at the top. During the 2002-03 Serena Slam, Williams defeated the likes of sister Venus in all four finals, but also Hall of Fame players Lindsay Davenport, Martina Hingis, Mary Pierce, Amelie Mauresmo, Jennifer Capriati and Kim Clijsters. Another Hall of Fame player in that era was Justine Henin, who ended Williams’ Grand Slam winning streak in the semifinals of the 2003 French Open.

During this Serena Slam, Williams only beat three players ranked in the top-10, and two of those wins were against Sharapova.

What made this Serena Slam so remarkable is that Williams did it on grit. She was big in the big moments, to pull out some amazing wins. And to do it at 33-years old (actually 32 at last year’s US Open which started the Serena Slam), that is a pretty remarkable outcome and a tribute to her longevity.

But coming into the semifinals against two players she had never lost to, and up a break in that third set against Vinci, this might be a loss that Williams will never be able to forget.

Drake, are you sure you want to date Serena Williams now?

Serena Williams talks to the media during the BNP Paribas Open in March, 2015.

Serena Williams talks to the media during the BNP Paribas Open in March, 2015.

It’s a tricky thing, dating a tennis player.

The latest It celebrity couple is now Serena Williams and the hip hop artist Drake.

For weeks, Williams and Drake were trying to play down anything was going on with them. And Williams even used the dreaded F word to describe Drake — friend.

Then they were caught making out in a restaurant by TMZ.

Drake might think he’s the Godfather of Love, but he might become another thing — scapegoat.

Williams is about to embark on a historic achievement in her Hall of Fame career. With a US Open victory, she will complete the Grand Slam, or winning tennis’ four major titles in the same season.

This year, Williams has been incredibly dominant. She played through sickness in her toughest major, the French Open, and still won the title.

The US Open is Williams’ best major. If she doesn’t win, guess who might get the blame.

It’s not as if Williams wasn’t going to get enough media attention in Flushing Meadows when the US Open begins next Monday. Now that she’s dating Drake, there will be even more attention on her. Will it be enough to derail her bid? Drake better hope not.

Blaming a tennis player’s significant other is not unusual. Remember when Brooke Shields dated and then married Andre Agassi? In 1997, Agassi’s career hit a low point as he dropped to 141 in the world. About the time Agassi and Shields finally called it quits, Agassi had a career revival, starting with his 1999 French Open title to complete the career Grand Slam. Agassi would then become the No. 1 ranked player at the end of the year to snap Pete Sampras’ streak of six consecutive years as the top-ranked player.

It’s not fair, and it might not even be accurate to say Shields was Agassi’s downfall. But that comes with the territory and it can be a terrible distraction.

Michael Kim’s still a pioneering force in sports journalism

Michael Kim (right) listens during a Sports Task Force event at the Asian American Journalist Association convention in San Francisco. Kim is joined by ESPN's New York Knicks and Brooklyn Nets writer Ohm Youngmisuk.

Michael Kim (right) listens during a Sports Task Force event at the Asian American Journalist Association convention in San Francisco. Kim is joined by ESPN’s New York Knicks and Brooklyn Nets writer Ohm Youngmisuk.

I like to think of Michael Kim as the journalist for impatient sports fans.

Many people know Kim from his days at ESPN. He actually got his start with the network in 1996 with the launch of ESPN News. Before the internet and instantaneous results on your phone or PC, ESPN News was a 24-hour service that fans could check in at anytime to get up to date on the latest results.

Kim went on to anchor SportsCenter as well as filled in for “Outside The Lines” and “First Take,” among other things.

Last year, Kim made the surprise move of leaving the “Worldwide Leader in Sports,” when he took a job with 120 Sports, which provides on-demand sports highlights and analysis in two-minute video segments.

And all videos are to fit into two minutes, hence the reason for the 120 names referring to the total seconds.

It’s an innovative app, voted among the best by ITunes and continues to grow.

Below is my interview with Kim during the Asian American Journalist Association convention. Kim, as well as myself, are involved with the Sports Task Force.

http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/70914929

I’ve grown to really like 120 Sports. While ESPN is my main source for sports news, it can get tedious waiting through the deflategate stories to get to highlights I want to see. With 120 Sports, I can find the highlights and thoughtful analysis from a very impressive team of experts. They do provide some fresh perspectives if you are looking for something different from ESPN’s crew.

This is a venture with Sports Illustrated and several of the major sports leagues, including Major League Baseball, NBA, NHL, NASCAR, and several college conferences.

Check it out when you get a chance.

http://www.120sports.com/video

Also, for those of you who will have interest in the AAJA Sports Task Force, we have two sites.

The Facebook page has stories posted from the various AAJA journalists covering a wide array of sports.

https://www.facebook.com/AAJASportsJournalists?ref=bookmarks

And if you want to learn more about the organization, the link to the AAJA Sports Task Force is below.

http://sportstaskforce.com/

Belinda Bencic is the real deal, not just because she beat Serena Williams

Caroline Wozniacki plays Belinda Bencic in a third round match on Stadium 3 at the Indian Wells Tennis Garden in Indian Wells, California on Monday, March 16, 2015. (Photo by Grace Donnelly/BNP Paribas Open)

Caroline Wozniacki plays Belinda Bencic in a third round match on Stadium 3 at the Indian Wells Tennis Garden in Indian Wells, California on Monday, March 16, 2015.
(Photo by Grace Donnelly/BNP Paribas Open)

Probably the first time many people heard of 18-year-old Belinda Bencic was last week when she upset No. 1 Serena Williams in the semifinals of the Rogers Cup in Toronto.

Some of the ESPN talk shows thought it was more about Williams and she wouldn’t be so fortunate if they meet again at the US Open.

They might be right, but they shouldn’t write off Bencic without knowing something about her.

Bencic made a splash in March, when she upset former No. 1 Caroline Wozniacki 6-4, 6-4 to reach the fourth round of the BNP Paribas Open. Wozniacki had reached the US Open final six months earlier. What made the victory even more impressive is that Wozniacki had double-bageled her in Istanbul in their previous meeting.

What was impressive about Bencic is she didn’t lead a 6-0, 6-0 loss derail her. She’s continued to rise. Now she’s No. 12 and could go up even higher by the US Open.

Here’s a look back at the story I wrote for the BNP Paribas Open website on Bencic. http://www.bnpparibasopen.com/en/media-and-news/news/2015/03/16/bencic-upsets-wozniacki

At the Rogers Cup, Bencic had to defeat six top-25 players to win the title: No. 25 Eugenie Bouchard in the first round, No. 5 Wozniacki in the second, No. 24 Sabine Lisicki in the third round, No. 6 Ana Ivanovic in the fourth round and then No. 3 Simona Halep in the final.

Last year, Bencic reached the quarterfinals of the US Open, which helped her win the WTA Newcomer of the Year award.

In 2013, Bencic won the Wimbledon and French Open girls junior titles.

A Swiss player, Bencic is getting help from Melanie Molitor, the mother of Martina Hingis. And the Swiss players are having quite a year. Timea Bacsinszky has had quite a comeback year this season.

But Bencic has proven she is the future of the WTA. The way she’s playing, the future could be now.